Completed
A multidisciplinary committee of experts studied the scientific underpinnings of human gene-editing technologies, their potential use in biomedical research and medicine -- including human germline editing -- and the clinical, ethical, legal, and social implications of their use. The committee set forth criteria that must be met before permitting clinical trials of heritable germline editing, provides conclusions on the crucial need for public education and engagement, and presents seven general principles for the governance of human genome editing.
Featured publication
Consensus
ยท2017
Genome editing is a powerful new tool for making precise alterations to an organism's genetic material. Recent scientific advances have made genome editing more efficient, precise, and flexible than ever before. These advances have spurred an explosion of interest from around the globe in the possib...
View details
Description
The study will examine the scientific underpinnings as well as the clinical, ethical, legal, and social implications of the use of human genome editing technologies in biomedical research and medicine. It will address the following issues related to human gene editing, including editing of the human germline:
1. What is the current state of the science of human gene editing, as well as possible future directions and challenges to further advances in this research?
2. What are the potential clinical applications that may hold promise for the treatment of human diseases? What alternative approaches exist?
3. What is known about the efficacy and risks of gene editing in humans, and what research might increase the specificity and efficacy of human gene editing while reducing risks? Will further advances in gene editing introduce additional potential clinical applications while reducing concerns about patient safety?
4. Can or should explicit scientific standards be established for quantifying off-target genome alterations and, if so, how should such standards be applied for use in the treatment of human diseases?
5. Do current ethical and legal standards for human subjects research adequately address human gene editing, including germline editing? What are the ethical, legal, and social implications of the use of current and projected gene-editing technologies in humans?
6. What principles or frameworks might provide appropriate oversight for somatic and germline editing in humans? How might they help determine whether, and which applications of, gene editing in humans should or should not go forward? What safeguards should be in place to ensure proper conduct of gene-editing research and use of gene-editing techniques?
7. Provide examples of how these issues are being addressed in the international context. What are the prospects for harmonizing policies? What can be learned from the approaches being applied in different jurisdictions?
The committee will address these questions and prepare a report that contains its findings and recommendations.
The report will provide a framework based on fundamental, underlying principles that may be adapted and adopted by any nation that is considering the development of guidelines. The report will also include a focus on advice for the United States.
Collaborators
Committee
Co-Chair
Co-Chair
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Sponsors
Department of Defense
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Private: Non Profit
The Greenwall Foundation
Wellcome Trust
Staff
Katherine Bowman
Lead
Andrew Pope
Fran Sharples
Major units and sub-units
Policy and Global Affairs
Lead
Division on Earth and Life Studies
Lead
Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education
Lead
Institute of Medicine
Lead
Committee on Science, Technology, and Law
Lead
U.S. Science and Innovation Policy
Lead
Board on Health Sciences Policy
Lead
Board on Life Sciences
Lead